Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolfgang Kosack (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 04:18, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Wolfgang Kosack
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

May not meet Wikipedia notability guidelines for academics. 747pilot (talk) 01:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. 747pilot (talk) 01:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, History,  and Germany. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 02:24, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Sorrowful delete Very Weak keep. I'm afraid the cites on GS do not come up to scratch, even for a very low cited field. Can WP:Author help? Xxanthippe (talk) 03:02, 31 August 2022 (UTC).
 * Weak keep. Reviews of Die legende im Koptischen: . Reviews of Lehrbuch des Koptischen:, . To me this meets the bare minimum of WP:AUTHOR (more than one published book with each having more than one published review). —David Eppstein (talk) 22:24, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep -- The list of publications, apparently all books, is certainly long enough to keep. I do not read German, so that it is difficult for me to judge their significance.  Peterkingiron (talk) 14:59, 4 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.