Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolfy edwards


 * Should not be deleted as it is not a vanity/nonsense article
 * I disagree; the article fits the definition of "vanity article" to a "T." We generally don't allow biographies of non-notable people on the Wikipedia, Ardonik included.  If you can demonstrate the notability of Mr. Edwards, the article might be retained, but otherwise, put his biography on a website, not here.  Delete.  --Ardonik.talk 18:47, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - vanity nonsense. Above vote is by the original anon author. Fuzheado | Talk 15:26, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - once again, I believe this should be deleted as it is vanity/nonsense. And user 81.134.203.139, please be so kind not to alter my vote. Guus 15:30, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Vanity/biography of a non-notable individual. If user 81.134.203.139 alters a vote again, that will be repeat vandalism and grounds for a quick ban, I believe. Geogre 15:34, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * move to BJAODN Dunc_Harris|&#9786; 16:04, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * User:81.134.203.139, 9 Sep 2004 15:23 says "save Wolfy" on talk (of course anon votes don't count, but hey. Dunc_Harris|&#9786; 16:08, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC))
 * Delete; nonsense/vanity. Psychonaut 17:06, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't even see a BJAODN in it.  Spatch 17:38, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unverifiable, vanity. Google uncovers nothing of note.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 22:08, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)