Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolven Ancestry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Wolven Ancestry

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Disputed prod. Non-notable band. Fails WP:MUSIC. DJSasso (talk) 15:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing suggesting they pass WP:BAND or even have any notability at all. I'd have speedied this if I came across it in newpages. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:56, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —Polargeo 2 (talk) 16:11, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Fails WP:MUS and WP:N. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 19:09, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm seeing quite a lot of coverage, but not sure about how good it is. I've added two links to interviews for now - will look again. Peridon (talk) 21:33, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per nom. No evidence of charting albums, notable members, or significant coverage to establish notability. Uncle Dick (talk) 17:31, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.