Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Unproductive and not funny. Please use userspace rather than actual encyclopedia processes for attempts at humor. See WP:AN.  Sandstein  18:01, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Woman

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Around half the editors of this article belong to the article topic. This clearly violates WP:COI, Wikipedia's policies on conflicts of interest. —Lowellian (reply) 05:50, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm just that into 'em. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 07:29, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * !vote altered. So is my mind.  Damn, I'm a lightweight.... -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 07:29, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, considering today's date. Maybe go for GA status? Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:39, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.