Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woman Kills Injured Man


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 07:30, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Woman Kills Injured Man

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

It is hard to find sources due to the fairly generic title, however I can't find much which would appear to meet the WP:GNG. With regard to the existing sources on the page, one is from the museum which displays the piece (so not independent) and another is a dead link to another online encyclopaedia (which would not appear to be a RS and may even be circular referencing from a WP project). So at best there appears to only be one source on the page that could count towards notability. JMWt (talk) 07:12, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts and Norway. JMWt (talk) 07:12, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:29, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * weak keep there’s a book ref (snippet) here and a magazine piece here. In addition it’s part of a major collection of modern art. Mccapra (talk) 09:24, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Just as a comment on these sources, the first is just a preview on GBooks so it isn't possible to make a definitive judgment but it looks like a passing mention. The second consists of two paragraphs. I'm not convinced either meet the standards of RS needed by the notability standards. JMWt (talk) 13:46, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. "fairly generic title" -huh?? It's probably no good looking for sources in English. The artist's bio lists a number of books on this rather colourful artist and his work published well after this is painted, so I think we can be confident there would be enough in these. Johnbod (talk) 15:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Searching for "Woman Kills Injured Man" gives news articles about road accidents. The fact that the artist is notable doesn't mean every work of theirs is notable because notability is not inherited. JMWt (talk) 15:38, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I didn't say that at all. But notable artists about whom a lot has been published will have significan coverage of all significant works. Johnbod (talk) 15:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok, well then consider this a challenge; show me some. JMWt (talk) 15:45, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Not having access to a good Norweigan library at the moment I can't. But perhaps someone else can. You do realize there is no obligation for sources to be online? Johnbod (talk) 15:58, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * You realise that when challenged you have to show that RS exist rather than just postulating that they must? JMWt (talk) 16:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep, prose has now been added about its initial display. Geschichte (talk) 08:50, 3 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.