Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women's Antifascist Front of Macedonia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep (non-administrative closure). No consensus to delete as the article has reliable sources and is indeed notable. This article was nominated for deletion not to long from it's creation. From there, the article did expand and reliable sources were found which proved it was notable. Thanks, RyRy  ( talk ) 04:44, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Women's Antifascist Front of Macedonia
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete non notable organisation Mayalld (talk) 14:07, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Keep It is obviously not internationally known, but it is very notable in all of former Yugoslavia. For example, I doubt I know every separatist group in Israel which have an article on Wikipedia. Here's an article on the subject on Serbian Wikipedia link. Köbra Könverse 14:14, 8 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. Article is historically interesting, a bit fringe I grant you, but may interest the scholar. Article is a stub and needs time, it was created only as of today, 8 July 2008. Article's notability and refimprove tags were added today. Seems to me to be unfair to delete before the article has had a chance to prove its worthiness. Yours Czar Brodie (talk) 14:20, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep To prevent systematic bias. If this was an american organisation it would have an article. See WikiProject Countering systemic bias for more info.-- Serviam  (talk)  14:22, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep It's encylcopedic, has reliable sources, and is easily notable enough for me. Vickser (talk) 16:10, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: Tagging an article within about 7 hours of its creation is hardly giving it a fair chance to develop. Its importance can be found with a little searching. Nunquam Dormio (talk) 21:31, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:RS without a problem. Ecoleetage (talk) 22:51, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - This has it's place in an encyclopedia. Why should we remove it? America69 (talk) 00:26, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - well sourced and notable. --Soman (talk) 09:11, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Notable and has reliable sources --Hattusili (talk) 08:24, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Macedonia-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  19:15, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  19:15, 10 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.