Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women2WinWales


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  k eep and move if necessary. - Mailer Diablo 03:24, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Women2WinWales
I do not think the organization is notable. No ghits Alex Bakharev 00:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep I believe that an organisation chaired by a Shadow Secretary of State is at least marginally notable.--Anthony.bradbury 00:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * You find GHits if you adjust the spacing, which the author clearly should do.--Anthony.bradbury 00:58, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep I believe that an organisation chaired by a Shadow Secretary of State is at least marginally notable.--Anthony.bradbury 00:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * You find GHits if you adjust the spacing, which the author clearly should do.--Anthony.bradbury 00:58, 14 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep but should be changed/merged into a yet-to-be-created page about the parent organisation "Women 2 Win" (with or without spaces according to actual usage) which would appear to have greater merit than the Welsh branch / section does by itself. Other examples of Conservative Party groups having WP pages can be found at List of organisations associated with the British Conservative Party.  Bencherlite 01:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep but only if moved to women2win and rewritten as such. --Dhartung | Talk 04:22, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Move per Dhartung. YechielMan 05:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Needs better sources, but it seems a legitimate topic. --Gwern (contribs) 05:50 14 February 2007 (GMT) 05:50, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, needs cleanup and merge with women2win though. --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 11:00, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Move, I agree with Bencherlite in the fact that it needs to be moved into a "Women 2 WIn" page.
 * Move per above. The subject is notable, but the article needs a bit of a rewrite. Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  00:40, 15 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.