Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women Fully Clothed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was nomination withdrawn. Whispering(talk/c) 22:44, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Women Fully Clothed
Originally prodded as nn; prod tag was removed by possible SPA 71.203.231.148 with the edit summary "its not like they dont exist". Forgive me if I find that argument less than compelling, so on to a full-blown AfD we go. Subject is nn; article is a WP:OR violation written in a wildly unencyclopedic manner; roughly half the sentences contain WP:WEASEL violations; and not one word of it is properly cited besides the fact that the group exists at all. Also, while Notability (comedy) is only a proposal at this point, I will note that this comedy troupe fails nine of the ten criteria currently listed, and for that tenth one it does pass, Notability (comedy) suggests that the article name instead be used as a redirect to the name of the troupe's most prominent cast member and listed as a side project on his/her page. Needless to say, I think this adds up to a big old Delete. Aaron 00:12, 2 October 2006 (UTC) Changing my vote to weak keep based on Roninbk's excellent cleanup. I still don't think they meet the proposed comedy guidelines, but they're close enough. --Aaron 15:37, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, but re-write - The article is mostly a re-hash of their about page, bordering on copyvio, but the comedy group is not only real, but seems to be fairly notable as touring comedy groups go. A few useful links that I found: review in NOW Magazine, Awards show entry on IMDB that mentions their nomination, I even found one place where a member was introduced in an acting context as "from Women Fully Clothed" . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harmil (talk • contribs)
 * I'm gonna go ahead and add those links in, and give it a rough sanding of the prickly points. --Roninbk t c # 02:35, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * OK, I've cleaned up the article significantly. It now passes Notability (comedy) on three counts, (multiple non-trivial published works, members otherwise notable, and featured in major comedy festival) I've stripped the POV, killed the weasels, and added stub categories. I hope that this article can now be saved from deletion. KEEP --Roninbk t c # 05:21, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Derex 06:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as rewritten. Note how I avoided making a pun on "stripped". D'oh. J I P  | Talk 09:16, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Good cleanup, team. Andrewa 10:09, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, rewrite is good, sources are cited and text is definitely encyclopedic and verifiable. --Ter e nce Ong (T 13:33, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep the rewrite is good.-- danntm T C 13:56, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I've never heard of them, but the participants are certainly notable. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:06, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep now that the nomination has been withdrawn. --Hyperbole 16:19, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per all above.UberCryxic 20:10, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.