Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women Live


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 16:49, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Women Live

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Struggling to see how this passes Notability No references,  a BIG conflict of interest with editors and only 6 issues published in late 80's.Theroadislong (talk) 13:29, 17 January 2013 (UTC) Theroadislong (talk) 13:29, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability ukexpat (talk) 19:58, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 20:54, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 20:54, 18 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - as not notable. The article has no references at all. Roger (talk) 09:38, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * DElete -- a magazine that cease publication after six issues can hardly be notable. If it had been notable, it would no doubt have continued being published.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:29, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.