Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women Teachers Training College


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:59, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Women Teachers Training College

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notability - appears to fail WP:EDU. No real information.
 * The nomination is incomplete. The college appears to be real, but the article is not even a stub. Bearian (talk) 16:29, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I searched on the Internet for sources, and found lots, but about different colleges and schools. I'm not sure any of them are notable. Bearian (talk) 18:38, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. I found some sources and created content for the article. I believe the school is notable -- it's the only school of its kind (although I don't yet know what "kind" that is) in Bangladesh, it has existed since at least 1952, and it occupies a building of historical and architectural interest. For future reference, the trick on finding sources was including the town name in the search string. --Orlady (talk) 15:24, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep because of Orlady's excellent work in expanding and referencing this article. Cullen328 (talk) 15:20, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. Seems to pass the bar for educational institutions, pretty well cited at this point. Also, looking at WP:EDU, I didn't see any standards for an article to fail. Monty845 (talk) 18:42, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment For what it's worth, when this article was nominated, it had no text or references -- only an infobox. By most "standards", that's not an article. --Orlady (talk) 21:00, 6 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per Orlady's improvements.--Arxiloxos (talk) 20:19, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.