Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Womens education on development


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:09, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Womens education on development

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can't find any evidence outside Wikipedia for this under its title or as Shikshaasthvavakaasha. It would help if it could be translated, but I can't even establish the language. Dubious notability as it stands  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:09, 4 February 2014 (UTC) 
 * Delete fails GNG BlueSalix (talk) 07:50, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment It could be transliterated Hindi or Sanskrit. I've found a few words that come up in Hindi-related sources when I Google them, in particular the word "naariiNaam", which led me to http://www.translatesanskrit.net/en/dictionary-sanskrit-english/naariiNaaM, which has the same upper-case N&#8212;as well as M, and which means, fittingly, "of women". —Largo Plazo (talk) 15:05, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:42, 12 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: Have failed to find the original language, so unless someone who knows it happens to come forward... Besides, it is still unsourced, so it could well be pointless anyway. BethNaught (talk) 17:35, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TNT. It would require translation, sourcing, and complete re-writing; it would also need to be moved from its current Hinglish title. Bearian (talk) 18:35, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete for goodness sake. At best this will turn out to be student essay. I note that the creator's only presence on other wikis is on sa:, the Sanskrit wiki. So this may be Sanskrit transliterated into roman characters. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:49, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.