Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wonderly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:28, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Wonderly

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Doesn't seem to pass NCORP, and it was seemingly written by a close connection to the subject. Sources are a bit iffy. I would've G11'd, but I'm not sure if it would qualify for that. Liliana UwU (talk / contribs) 05:41, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Liliana UwU  (talk / contribs) 05:41, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:54, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: An article on a start-up brand of Bigframe which was active around 9 years ago and appears to have ended sometime before 2015, judging from the mention here. Searches find various similarly-named ventures but are not finding evidence that this one ever attained notability. AllyD (talk) 09:00, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete it's been defunct for almost 10 yrs (per above, I can't confirm), still uses the present text in the article and appears to be a COI contribution. Delete. No sources found and what's used in the article isn't sufficient. Oaktree b (talk) 19:20, 28 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.