Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wong Wah-bo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:54, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Wong Wah-bo

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Short and unsourced article on a non-notable ancestor of Wing Chun Kuen. If any sourced information is found, then we could think about keeping this article, but given the size of it, it would be better just to place the information at Wing Chun's page. Victão Lopes I hear you... 00:35, 10 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. We have a very strict Wiki policy forbidding original research. JBsupreme (talk) 02:17, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:RS, WP:OR, WP:V. No problem with WP:N since (if claims are true) subject plays a strong role in the art of martial arts. --  李博杰   | —Talk contribs email 10:27, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete: The article itself is terrible (maybe CSD quality). As for the subject, there are some sources out there on it in magazines and books. See . --Odie5533 (talk) 19:03, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  15:02, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Umm, what is this? I can't find a reason that this doesn't blatantly fail WP:NOTABLE. User:Nezzadar (speak) 22:45, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.