Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wonky (music)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  So Why  20:47, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Wonky (music)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Nominated on behalf of a comment made at Template talk:Dubstep, at the bottom, quoting one of the references citing this article. "Wonky" is not a genre, and the article in its current state is bordering on CSD A1.. describing a style of music as being characterised by "use of synths" and "slow rhythm" is not exactly helpful in determining why it's so unique that it can be considered a separate musical genre. While the term "aquacrunk" does seem to have been used by multiple sources (though none explicitly suggest that it's synonymous with "wonky"), it is not necessary to turn every buzzword the press uses into a separate "genre" article. - file lake  shoe  11:56, 8 November 2008 (UTC) 
 * Speedy delete per nom + fails WP:OR, the article does not correspond to the references. The clone 'Aquacrunk' must be deleted for the same reasons. --True Steppa (talk) 17:03, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect Seems to be the same thing asAquacrunk ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:34, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per reliable references in the article. -- Yaneleksklus (talk) 21:29, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 13 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 06:05, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 04:00, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Pitchfork and Guardian are very reliable sources. If Wonky Techno and Aquacrunk are the same thing they should be merged/redirected to this article as it is the best sourced.  Claphands (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 19:11, 19 November 2008 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.