Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wonmyung Elementary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. The votes have divided almost equally, but redirect is in the policy, and it is also preferable to deletion.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:39, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Wonmyung Elementary School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Schools are not inherently notable; an article on such must actually provide sources to show that it meets either WP:ORG or WP:GNG. This one does neither. Tarc (talk) 00:40, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: A relatively recent (1989) elementary school in a large city. No claims to notability made. Hithladaeus (talk) 14:04, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable elementary school. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NSCHOOL and WP:ORG. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:06, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 6 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete : no [non-primary] sources are included in the article and I can't find any either. — Bilorv(talk)(c)(e) 17:54, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect (see below) — Bilorv(talk)(c)(e) 07:54, 13 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. -- do ncr  am  18:10, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as fails NSCHOOL. – Davey 2010 Talk 18:30, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect per below - Not sure how I missed that but hey ho . – Davey 2010 Talk 01:44, 13 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - as above. Neutralitytalk 22:08, 6 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Seocho District, per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. North America1000 05:35, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Seocho District, per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:39, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable elementary school.  Heyyouoverthere (talk) 04:20, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: Notability criteria are guidelines and as such it is pefectly acceptable to interpret them with common sense. However, 'redirect' is an official alternative to deletion that is anchored in policy. Being non-toxic, school articles fall squarely in that area of policy and 'redirect' for non notable mainstream schools has been fully established by consencus through precedent as evidenced by hundreds, if not thousands, of redirected school articles. The oppose votes here, especially those from, ,  and  may be simply due to the fact that they are not aware of the standard practice that is documented at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:19, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I suppose that's true enough in my case. I personally don't really see much point in redirecting the article but since WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES recommends it, I'll go with it. I feel a bit like I'm just switching sides to the team that looks like they're going to win, but oh well. — Bilorv(talk)(c)(e) 07:54, 13 June 2015 (UTC)


 * I don't have a special problem with that, except that it was not clear, from the article, at least to me, what the parent reference would be. If other people have solved it, that's fine. I do demur from the consensus, but consensus holds. Hithladaeus (talk) 14:05, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.