Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wood-Bright Professor of Women's Studies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete on the grounds of being silly vandalism (CSD criterion G3) and an attack page (CSD criterion A6). It's reasonably obvious that someone thought that it would be a grand wheeze to attack someone named Nic Frost by writing a Wikipedia article about a fictitious university position and filling it full of both subtle and blatant references to Mr. Frost's sexual activities. I had a look to see whether I could find anything real to write a stub article about. I couldn't. Uncle G 15:20, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Additional discussion on the extent of the hoax is at Talk:University of Adelaide. --Elonka 16:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I've temporarily restored the page history at the request of those investigating a possible pattern of hoax articles. Uncle G 17:24, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Wood-Bright Professor of Women's Studies
This appears to be a hoax, there is no mention of it anywhere apart from WP, including the websites of the University of Adelaide and Pfizer. &mdash; Dunc|&#9786; 23:34, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom... appears to be a hoax? That's very charitable phrasing. Yomangani 23:47, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a hoax. Kevin 08:58, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: '"...his dedicated servicing of some of the most desperate women in Australia..."? Obvious hoax! --Canley 09:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.