Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wood Oaks Junior High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Northbrook School District 27. per common outcomes JForget  21:48, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Wood Oaks Junior High School

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Junior high school which fails WP:ORG. No significant coverage in reliable sources, simply the routine coverage expected of a school of this size. Most of the article's content is likely unverifiable. Claritas § 09:39, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect to Northbrook School District 27; I had created redirect to the district, but with changes applied after, feel that WP:ORG applies; no visible coverage exists outside of local/state importance, where WP:ORG tends to regional coverage or better. Aeternitas827 (talk) 09:44, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the high school/school district per common practice. Umbralcorax (talk) 13:20, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree that this article fails WP:ORG. (sorry)WaxonWaxov (talk) 14:30, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - meeting WP:ORG is not a requirement for a merge or redirect; indeed if WP:ORG was met then that would be grounds for a standalone article. TerriersFan (talk) 18:53, 30 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  --  Jujutacular  talk 16:51, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  --  Jujutacular  talk 16:51, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to Northbrook School District 27 per usual practice. It isn't individually notable hence the merge/redirect action. TerriersFan (talk) 18:51, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Northbrook School District 27 per common outcomes. I can't see much that warrants merger. Seems like a lot of OR. P. D. Cook  Talk to me! 16:25, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.