Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wooden car physics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 20:36, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Wooden car physics

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Content is original research, "I tested" and so on. Vuo (talk) 22:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, as how-to/instruction guide and original research. — Snigbrook 22:32, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Interesting, and a quite good piece of research. That's the problem. It's original research and not Wikipedia material. Peridon (talk) 23:11, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Intromissing, no context. OK, it is badly written original research. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 23:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: A how to guide. Schuym1 (talk) 23:45, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - No context, attempt to communicate, unsalvageably incoherent. Also original research and self-promotion. AlexTiefling (talk) 16:46, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. An essay about a Boy Scout racing event.  --Clay Collier (talk) 13:43, 30 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.