Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodlake Elementary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Redirect to Judson Independent School District (Non-administrator closing). --Tikiwont 13:59, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Woodlake Elementary School

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

One-sentence stub: redirect to Judson Independent School District as per Articles for deletion/Spring Meadows Elementary School SarekOfVulcan 04:39, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Judson Independent School District. Copy and paste of my above comment. Useight 05:27, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn. CRGreathouse (t | c) 13:27, 25 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions.   —Dahliarose 08:50, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge into local schol distrct/locality article. Twenty Years 14:53, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect as per the typical nn local elementary school.--JForget 23:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect (copied and pasted comment, although I have looked over this article, such as it is) to Judson Independent School District so that anyone looking for an article for this school will go to the place where we're more likely to have information on something related to it. The link to the school district on that page may be useful to readers.Noroton 14:25, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment on process (another copied and pasted comment in the hope that it's more likely to be read) This is one of several almost-identical, one-line stubs created by the same editor who then seems to have left the project months ago. Either no one else or hardly anyone else has edited any of these articles since. No one seems to care about them. This kind of situation is what the template is for. I hope editors who want to get articles like these deleted will use it in the future and save the rest of us some time and effort. Noroton 14:25, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * But prod wouldn't have given the "merge" option. Besides, there was a distant possibility that someone would have come up with encyclopedic content for some of them, and I wanted the full AfD to give that a chance to happen.--SarekOfVulcan 14:57, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * OK. Good point. The WP:HEY improvements tend to happen with high schools, sometimes happen with middle schools, and I won't say they never happen with elementary schools, but I can't recall when -- but if you wanted to give it that chance, it's certainly a valid point. Given the unlikelihood of improvements, I would have just been WP:BOLD and merged, but that's a personal preference. Noroton 21:45, 30 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.