Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodmeister Master Builders


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 16:12, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Woodmeister Master Builders

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of significant coverage in independent sources. Hirolovesswords (talk) 03:16, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:04, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:04, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:42, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:ORGCRIT.--Pontificalibus 11:32, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:00, 1 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Even throwing in this Worcester Telegram piece there just isn't the level of coverage required by WP:CORPDEPTH to justify keeping this article. Lots of local and well-regarded businesses aren't notable enough for Wikipedia. This appears to be one of them. Bakazaka (talk) 03:01, 2 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.