Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodridge, Queensland


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy keep per nominator, and no-one else has voted delete. JYolkowski // talk 15:12, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Woodridge, Queensland
Funny, but unsalvageably POV, totally non-notable, and uncited. --Cornflake pirate 11:09, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Changed vote to Keep with total rewrite, based on precedent, eg Toowong, Queensland. Sorry guys, I genuinely thought this was non-notable. Anyway I guess this can be closed. --Cornflake pirate 06:08, 16 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep, it exists, although the article needs improvement. RaF, 15 July 2006.
 * Keep and tidy up, assuming the district does exist. Nuttah68 11:12, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment it does exist (I live nearby) --Cornflake pirate 11:23, 15 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep, since it's been tidied up. The Brisbanite in me says it'll be hard for it to be notable sans the amusing text, but I'm sure it can be done. BigHaz 13:24, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Google tells it does exist. Article is no-longer POV. Needs thorough improvement to lift from stub status. &mdash; Ambuj Saxena (talk) 13:58, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep cities and towns have inherent notability  hoopydink  Conas tá tú? 14:33, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Woodridge isn't a city or a town. It's a suburb. --Cornflake pirate 04:24, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Not sure how it works down under, but in North America, suburbs generally are cities/towns themselves. Resolute 05:33, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as rewritten. -- nae'blis (talk) 17:39, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Article is now in reasonable shape and Woodridge is a real place with real communities of interest. Capitalistroadster 00:43, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Capitalistroadster 00:43, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as the article is now quite reasonable and Woodridge is a real suburb which is quite well known and a significant "mini-CBD" of sorts for the local area, which seems to be enough for it to survive based on many precedents. Blue Hiker 12:12, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment There are some sections in the Logan City article regarding the history of the Woodridge area which may be better placed in this article to make it more in depth. Blue Hiker 12:12, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.