Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodrow "Woody" Morton Jr.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Per G3 - blatantly incorrect information.  So Why  11:47, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Woodrow "Woody" Morton Jr.
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

Probably a WP:Hoax], as the supposed Academy Award in 2001 is not true, per 74th_Academy_Awards. Also, no Gnews or Ghits, which would not be possible if he were as famous as the article claims. I don't feel a CSD is the way to go about this, so I am proposing for AFD instead. Fbifriday (talk) 07:28, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I should explain why I am not going about this through CSD. I can not prove it's a hoax, and as the article makes a claim of notability, I can not put a CSD tag for a non-notable person. --Fbifriday (talk) 07:29, 11 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as a hoax. --Vejvančický (talk) 08:46, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD as a hoax, and also per WP:BLP. There is a real actor by this name who has appeared on the television series mentioned in this article. However, almost everything else in this article (and there is not much) is blatantly inaccurate. I don't know if someone is trying to embarrass the real actor by giving him a fake Wikipedia biography, but this article is primarily devoted to unsourced and unsourceable claims about a living person, so it needs to get deleted. This page may not look like an attack page, but making obviously false claims about a person's purported achievements can be a way of mocking them, so I would prefer to speedily delete this article as an attack page. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:15, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.