Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woods of Ypres


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 21:56, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Woods of Ypres

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Procedural nomination. PROD was contested. I can't find RS on a quick google search, beyond gig listings and promo stuff Ged  UK  20:51, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete; fails WP:MUSIC. Ironholds (talk) 20:55, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete; as per nom: didn't find any  RS; as per Ironholds: fails WP:MUSIC--Kudpung (talk) 02:31, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Being reviewed repeatedly in a national music magazine, Exclaim!, is an indication of notability (and is pretty good for a metal band who release their own albums). I've added several citations to Exclaim!. Keep per WP:MUSIC criterion #1. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 18:26, 24 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:BAND; This article meets the first Criteria for musicians and ensembles "Has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician or ensemble itself and reliable.". References are listed in the article. Andy14and16 (talk) 19:39, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The group's had enough coverage from Canadian press outlets to pass WP:MUSIC. Chubbles (talk) 04:23, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per above; also as having toured; easily passes WP:BAND. Bearian (talk) 19:41, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:BAND, see also bravewords.com (BW&BK).--  C  anniba loki  13:29, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and a good sized paragraph from Chicago Daily Herald, article "Sonic wonders of 08" (was number 3). duffbeerforme (talk) 11:57, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:BAND and seemingly WP:GNG as well. Alzarian16 (talk) 13:04, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.