Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodson Lateral Road


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was No consensus Ral315 (talk) 10:07, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Woodson Lateral Road
It's just a road. Nominating this for precedence more so than its non-notability, but either works. Stifle 15:16, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge urban legend stuff about ghosts/whatnot into Woodson, Arkansas and redirect. howcheng   [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 18:00, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge and cleanup for tone if verified. I have no real preference about where this should be covered but local Urban legends of this kind deserve coverrage, although I wonder how a biker could die on such a straight road... - Mgm|(talk) 00:27, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

'''This AfD debate is being relisted in order to prompt a more thorough consensus. Please place new discussion below this line.' &rarr; Ξxtreme'' Unction |yakkity yak 01:25, 18 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep. -- JJay 01:35, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. Good article on good road + what Jcuk said. -- JJay 21:16, 18 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete nn road --Jaranda wat's sup 07:37, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep now that it is heavily marked for tons of cleanup I'd like to see it have a chance to be improved and refrenced, if not it can always be relisted. xaosflux  Talk  / CVU  17:37, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. I wanted to find something notable, and I tried. I like any article with the word, "wierdness" in it. But, in this case, I don't see anything to save nor hope it'll improve even with every cleanup tag we have. Ifnord 18:15, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep The M1 is just a road but it has an entry. Woodson Lateral Road is verifiable, non notability is irrelevant as its not official Wiki rules, just guidelines by which some but by no means all Wikipedians choose to operate. Jcuk 21:12, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete (feel free to Merge, as per Mgm). Notable means verifiable and well-known, and important, and liely to be looked up - what's irrlevant about that?  "Some but by no means all Wikipedians" vandalize articles, but that doesn't make vandalizing either relevant or irrelvant to the usefulness of information in Wikipedia. JesseW, the juggling janitor 21:53, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment - the deletion of this would not set a precedent, unless you're looking to form a precedent on urban legends. --SPUI (talk) 20:18, 19 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.