Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodwork for Joiners and Cabinetmakers for Beginners and Improvers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 15:52, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Woodwork for Joiners and Cabinetmakers for Beginners and Improvers

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No Google Books, News or Scholar hits for this previously prodded non-notable book. In fact, it has only 30 Google hits period. Abductive  (reasoning) 12:10, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this book. Joe Chill (talk) 03:15, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * On the fence, awaiting more information. I have a feeling that notability may come down to #1 or #4 in books; "The book has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself, with at least some of these works serving a general audience" or "The book is the subject of instruction at multiple grade schools, high schools, universities or post-graduate programs in any particular country." There's one review in the article, so we'd still need one in a general audience publication. It's also in the collection of 4 colleges/universities in the US (remember, the book was published in Wales, so this is more impressive than it sounds at first), but that doesn't get us to "the subject of instruction". -- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  03:19, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. I haven't yet investigated the notability of this subject, but I would point out that there's a big difference between a book being held in a university library and it being a subject of instruction. For every book that is the subject of instruction at a university there will be thousands that are held by its library. For example Princeton University library holds Noddy goes to Toyland, but I very much doubt that it's the subject of instruction at Princeton. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:24, 24 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete For now I can't find anything that says it is notable. The Institute of Carpenters does not endorse it in the source cited; it's a book review, taken mostly from the forward of the book. --IP69.226.103.13 (talk) 05:02, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.