Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woody Smith


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:06, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Woody Smith

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Alex declined this PROD to be disruptive, as best I can tell. The individual is not notable. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:35, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:36, 20 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep FOUR straight league championships. Four. Not to mention being featured here, here among a myriad of others. He spent many years in the AAA and at least once was purchased by a major league club. It wouldn't surprise me if he was a phantom ballplayer at one point. Alex (talk) 01:03, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - as noted, four league championships, and that equals distinct notability. In addition, a for the nominator for his assumption of bad faith and spamming AfD with "not notable" ballplayers who clearly are. - The Bushranger One ping only 07:10, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I take issue with that. This individual is not "clearly" notable. While I nominated too many at once, I don't regret nominating this article individually. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:30, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:07, 20 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per above. Spanneraol (talk) 14:30, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Four championships, That meets the required standard for WP:GNG, very notable, I will tag this for rescue. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 19:26, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Since when do four minor league championships meet GNG? – Muboshgu (talk) 19:30, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn per sourcing and WP:SNOW, despite some arguments I don't find valid. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:30, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.