Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woody Woodpecker (1941 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Woody Woodpecker (1941 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Another Woody Woodpecker cartoon article that fails NFILM, and GNG. From a before search, I could not find a single reliable source with significant coverage of this short. No indications of notability. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:24, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:24, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:40, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Film debut of Woody Woodpecker and Andy Panda. Donald D23   talk to me  17:57, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * And how does that mean it passes GNG, exactly? This feels like a drive-by vote without actually considering if sources exist that cover the short. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 18:25, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Per WP:NFSOURCES The film features significant involvement (i.e., one of the most important roles in the making of the film) by a notable person and is a major part of their career." Even though Woody is not a "person", how can the film debut of a notable fictional character not be considered 'significant' and 'a major part of their career'?   Donald D23   talk to me  19:15, 25 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep notable for being film premiere of iconic Woody Woodpecker and Andy Panda characters and is discussed in detail in The Encyclopedia of Animated Cartoons and Of Mice and Magic as well as [cartoonresearch]. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 19:11, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep The one cartoon (the debut episode) which deserves to be an auto-keep among this #itsnotlooneytunesdeletethemall rash of Woody noms. You have time to delete, you have time to find sources.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 02:15, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: I will have to vote keep per historical notability. According to this source - "In 1982, Lantz donated 17 artifacts to the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of American History, among them a wooden model of Woody Woodpecker and a storyboard from the character’s 1941 debut." So, unlike the other shorts, a storyboard from this cartoon is in a notable museum. SL93 (talk) 19:35, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as an obvious case of WP:SNOW - Per above; finding specific sources may take some additional effort because of the notability of the eponymous character, but others have already demonstrated their existence.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.