Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woohoo (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   snow keep per WP:SNOW, non-admin closure. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:39, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Woohoo (song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete doesn't meet Wikipedia's rules Jagoperson (talk) 09:11, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:10, 31 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. Coverage from secondary sources? Check. Positioning on major charts? Check. A notable release from two major artists? Check. Therefore, it passes WP:NSONGS. KingOfTheMedia (talk) 12:43, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep' - Coverage, reception, and charting, passes WP:NSONGS with flying colors. Candyo32 (talk) 12:52, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Are you joking? you provided no reason for the nomination itself, "It doesn't meet wiki rules" is not a valid reason. The article clearly passes WP:NSONG. Its charted in two countries, Clearly has good refs, Two notable artists. Whats the problem? ..:CK:..  ( talk 2 me ) 05:13, 1 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep per ..:CK:..s comments. Crystal Clear x3 11:25, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Sourced, reviewed, charted. Obvious keep. Nom should check out WP:NSONG and WP:GNG. P. D. Cook  Talk to me! 14:06, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - Sourced, charted and officially released on iTunes. Theuhohreo (talk) 18:07, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - WP:NSONG and WP:GNG. --BGTopDon's User Page Contributions 02:06, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep It's an official single and deserves its own page on Wikipedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.70.108.58 (talk) 08:32, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per all the comments above. Alecsdaniel (talk) 09:48, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep although i don't agree with this, it is a clear snow ball. The AfD should be closed and the article needs improving. Regards, Lil-unique1 (talk) 13:00, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * If the nom were to recognize this and withdraw, then someone could close it as speedy keep. P. D. Cook  Talk to me! 13:21, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Keep per Candyo32 and KingOfThemedia. Also, past outcomes have kept charted songs. Bearian (talk) 17:41, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep It's snowing. Tb hotch Ta lk C.  18:12, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep not only did it chart, it charted on the US Billboard Hot 100, which is the big one as far as the music industry goes. Nomination rationale is also weak/unclear. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  23:10, 3 June 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.