Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woolamaloo Gazette


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (WP:NPASR). N ORTH A MERICA 1000 02:43, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Woolamaloo Gazette

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

blog with flash-in-the-pan notability, only because someone got fired. Has faded into obscurity since then. The Dissident Aggressor 22:34, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  22:56, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  22:56, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  22:57, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Selective merge to Blogs. The blog's author, Joe Gordon, just might be notable if one took this incident together with his subsequent blogging on comics and science fiction for Forbidden Planet International, for which he certainly continues to get frequent mentions - if sufficient of these could be shown to be substantial and reliable enough, together with this incident and its coverage, for a standalone article on Gordon, I'd be inclined to convert this article into that one. Otherwise, the incident did have enough notability at the time, as an early (and precedent-setting) employment case involving blogging, that a couple of sentences at Blogs are certainly justified. PWilkinson (talk) 11:30, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:37, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.