Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woolston Park


 * Again, nothing wrong w/Woolston I'm sure, but not encyclopedic . Gwimpey 21:40, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm probably in the minority, but my vision of Wikipedia includes things of local interest at some point down the road. Maybe one day it will be a truly comprehensive encyclopedia, where not only things of global and national interest, but also local interest (such as the history of landmarks, local parks, businesses, street names, etc.) will be included. Everyone looking for any encyclopedic information will come here, no matter how local their interest happens to be. That's perhaps many years down the road, when server space is less of a problem, but as it is I think pages like this are too small and few between to worry about deleting. -- Matty j 21:53, May 5, 2004 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm fairly new to Wikipedia, so I'll go w/the flow. Gwimpey 08:25, 6 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Harmless.  TB 22:20, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, agree with Matty. Let's not waste energy fighting battles we don't need to. --bodnotbod 22:22, May 5, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, don't see a problem with it at all. Wikipedia is not paper! -- Graham  :) | Talk 22:56, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. agree with Matty -- Chris 73 | Talk 23:12, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Everyking 23:44, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. RickK 02:44, 6 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Comment: As with high schools, I think I see a definite shift here towards inclusion. Watching with interest. Andrewa 18:08, 6 May 2004 (UTC)