Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woolworths @ Gull


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 21:00, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Woolworths @ Gull

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete. Non-notable business arrangement.
 * Delete. Non-notable. Call me suspicious by I wonder at a user whose only edits relate to one company and its subsidiaries! DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 03:47, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.  —-- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:31, 19 August 2011 (UTC) -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:31, 19 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - I didn't see many notable links on Google and Yahoo aside from small mentions here and here. SwisterTwister   talk  05:30, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 19 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Article is about a partnership between Gull Petroleum and Woolworths Supermarkets (New Zealand), apparently involving the addition of convenience shops to gas stations in New Zealand.  I'm surprised that nobody has ever thought of this before. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:23, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non-notable spam. Joe Chill (talk) 23:57, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * At best a smerge into Gull, but outright deletion seems the most sensible outcome. Grutness...wha?  00:24, 20 August 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.