Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wooster Collective


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Dusti*Let's talk!* 06:41, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Wooster Collective

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It doesn't appear to pass notability requirements. There are a lot of Google hits, but they're quite sparse and trivial, such as " “I don’t mind destruction, I don’t mind debate, but I do mind something that comes off as being intellectual but is actually simplistic and juvenile,” said Marc Schiller, whose Web site, Wooster Collective, documents street art. " and this one is on the more extensive side of brief mentions. Graywalls (talk) 12:54, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:01, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. <b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 13:01, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. <b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 13:01, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep – I can understand the nomination to AFD in that there is no true INDEPTH articles concerning just Wooster Collective in a typical Google News search. However there are quite a few mentions and references of the Wooster Collective in RS such as the New York Times – Huffington Post – Time (magazine) and several other secondary reliable sources, as shown here .  In addition, if we expand our search to include Google Scholar we see that the organization is well represented with more In-depth exposure as shown here [].  Given this information I believe the organization has gained enough attention to have a piece here at Wikipedia.  Thanks ShoesssS Talk 14:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:46, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: While this is leaning towards keep I think some more discussion is warranted since User:Theredproject just added some more citations to the article.
 * Keep - I just added four more NYT citations, bringing the total to 5, one of which is of decent depth. It tells you something if RS are regularly referring to a website, or one of its creators in their articles about the subject, or asking them for quotes in stories. Full disclosure, I met Schiller a few times a decade ago, though I never worked with him, and don't think this affects my impartiality at all. --Theredproject (talk) 00:56, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <b style="color:#F00">D</b><b style="color:#F60">u</b><b style="color:#090">s</b><b style="color:#00F">t</b><b style="color:#60C">i</b>*Let's talk!* 13:45, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep – Based on the coverage of the subject on authority media - including outside of Google News. Although not in-depth per se, but there is extensive coverage of the website with many references being made referring to the subject as an authority among street art blogs and collections. Although this is not a solid keep, I'm leaning towards an upvote. ⚜ L i t h O l d o r ⚜  (T) 14:23, 17 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep Seems to pass WP:GNGGermcrow (talk) 18:47, 19 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.