Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worcestershire schools


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 03:15, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Worcestershire schools

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Totally unreferenced list of schools, that is chock full of POV, spelling and grammar inaccuracies, and that places all schools in Worcestershire into a league against each other but doesn't point out on what criteria. Once you cut out the league table and the unreferenced POV you're left with the contents of the Worcestershire schools category so I believe this should be deleted forthwith.  role player 22:35, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. We've got the Worcestershire schools category for this info - doesn't need its own article, especially not with the POV stuff.  Graymornings (talk) 22:40, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. This looks like a "Baxter collage" of opinions from one person about how each school's results have been.  Even a dash of Lea & Perrins can't save this one. Mandsford (talk) 01:14, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 07:40, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 07:41, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   —• Gene93k (talk) 07:42, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. List of schools in the West Midlands already covers the topic. Worcestershire schools reads like copyvio from Ofsted inspection reports. • Gene93k (talk) 07:48, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * If it's a copyvio, this is even worse than I thought. The grammar ain't so good and the spelin is wurse. Mandsford (talk) 14:21, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I just saw the line: This artical has been put together by the Worcestershire OFSTED inspection team. The infomtion below is detailed and to the point. Article wrote by - l.kingston and m-granger - Ofsted inspection leaders. - now that is quite possibly one of the funniest things I have seen. You'd think OFSTED inspectors would be able to get basic spelling right, huh? --  role player 02:40, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, POV/OR. Stephen Turner (Talk) 09:20, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a thoroughly bad article, probably based on a journalist's rewrite of a report to Worcestershire County Council, perhaps by Ofsted. Note Ludlow is not in Worcesterhire and should not appear in any event.  Peterkingiron (talk) 22:19, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.