Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WordSmith Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 03:33, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

WordSmith Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability per WP:CORP or WP:GNG. Article is sourced only to brief mentions in a regional newspaper. WP:PROD contested without edit summary. Kinu t/c 15:33, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 19 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Trivial coverage ("quotations from an organization's personnel as story sources"), WP:CORPDEPTH. – Wdchk (talk) 01:34, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
 * WordSmith Records was found in the news section of Vents Magazine on 23 September 2014. JimmyMac80 (UTC)
 * Regardless of whether this source actually meets WP:RS, this article actually looks like a press release promoting a contest and does not help in establishing the notability of the company. -- Kinu  t/c 14:19, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete The resources are not reliable (e.g. Vents magazine seems to be a one-man operation, with him as author and editorial director). The others are insignificant "local business" articles. LaMona (talk) 15:41, 25 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.