Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Word by word dictionary


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy Delete per G12-Copyvio (non-admin closure).  brew crewer  (yada, yada) 17:44, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Word by word dictionary

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Speedy tag was removed, this to me is vandalism, somebody making a point maybe. Pollytyred (talk) 00:28, 2 February 2008 (UTC) Keep this please because it helps me alot! this rklemme person sounds good. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.132.5.27 (talk) 03:36, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wiktionary is over there. Also, I strongly suspect the definitions here are copied from somewhere. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 00:40, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Obvious gibberish. Somebody has clearly copied the definitions of the letter A out of an existing dictionary. The content of the article does not, therefore, match the title. MrMelonhead (talk) 03:50, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete, possible vandalism, possible copyvio, nonsense, and, on top of that, WP:NOT. Redfarmer (talk) 03:57, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Snowball delete. If I was an admin I would delete and close this now. No value whatsoever, more or less patent nonsense, no point in going through process to discuss this further.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 13:00, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Jeez! -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 13:19, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - I'm not sure wikitionary would even want this... --T-rex 15:19, 2 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.