Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wordnet.Net


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 14:08, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Wordnet.Net
Does not meet WP:WEB. Google finds 7 links to it, and the alexa rank is in excess of five million. - C HAIRBOY (☎) 01:52, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per my nomination. - C HAIRBOY (☎) 01:52, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable website. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-17 02:24Z 
 * Delete, per nomination.--ragesoss 04:20, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. Dbtfz 04:25, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as vanity advertising. SycthosTalk 05:07, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, advert Incognito 05:18, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into Wordnet. &mdash;gorgan_almighty 14:46, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into Wordnet, remove advert language. Dustimagic *\o/* (talk/contribs) *\o/* 19:37, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete - WordNet.Net is only 6 months old so there are few google links. It is an open source resource used by developers and researchers.  WordWeb is allowed to stay (linked from WordNet) and WordWeb is freeware/commercial ware, so shouldn't WordNet.Net as an open source project be allowed to stay?  WordNet.Net is also linked by Princeton's WordNet project in their related links ebswift
 * Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Please taka a moment to read WP:WEB to get an idea of which websites are and are not listed here.  Also note, WP:NOT describes that Wikipedia is not, among other things, a web page directory.  Whether or not something is open source has no bearing on whether it merits an article.  It's nothing personal, it's just a guideline being used to keep this an encyclopedia.  Best regards, C HAIRBOY  (☎) 20:00, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ifnord 22:00, 17 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.