Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Words: types of definition


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  00:22, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Words: types of definition

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

contested prod; Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:27, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Wikipedia is no place for personal essays. This is filled with original research Doc StrangeMailbox Orbitting Black Hole Strange Frequencies 17:39, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems to be an inferior version of the Semantics article. Colonel Warden (talk) 19:20, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, I'd call it an inferior version of Definition, not Semantics. Klausness (talk) 20:23, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Reads like someone's freshman paper, and there's nothing useful here that isn't already at Definition. Klausness (talk) 20:23, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete As others have pointed out, the various types of definitions (connotative, lexical, etc.) are pretty well covered in the article Definition. If there's anything useful that can be merged, have at it.  Mandsford (talk) 21:21, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.