Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Working Class Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 21:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Working Class Party

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Small Trotskyist party almost entirely sourced to its own website and electoral returns. No evidence of WP:SIGCOV beyond noting the party exists. Toa Nidhiki05 16:02, 23 March 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   19:11, 30 March 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:31, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, Maryland,  and Michigan.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:13, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep see, , .--User:Namiba 13:58, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The World Socialist Web Site is not a reliable source. Toa Nidhiki05 12:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I quote from WP:RSPSS: Most editors consider [the World Socialist Web Site] to be reliable for the attributed opinions of its authors. There is no consensus on whether it is reliable for factual reporting. -The Gnome (talk) 17:26, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep as per User:Namiba's three sources that illustrate notability. CT55555 (talk) 03:39, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Soft Keep. There are at best two-and-a-half adequate sources, already cited above, and, try as I might, I cannot find others, besides the usual self-references, routine listings (e.g. this), etc. As the fortunes of this new party have indeed suffered from the pandemic's lockdown, the lack of notability might be attributed there. So far, the subject barely reaches an acceptable level of notability. -The Gnome (talk) 17:26, 12 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.