Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Workplace Virtualization


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 19:58, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Workplace Virtualization

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

Original research or a neologism with no indication of notability. – Hysteria18 (Talk • Contributions) 18:50, 13 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:15, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Part essay, part promotion for the software "VMWare" referenced in the external links section. --MelanieN (talk) 04:44, 14 December 2009 (UTC)MelanieN
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete I thought I could rewrite it, but in trying, I find I am not sure I  understand the article's basic premise,  "a world of difference between Desktop Virtualization and Workspace Virtualization. "--("workspace virtualization" seems to be used in the article alternately with "workplace virtualization")  I think from the examples given that what is meant might be a virtual working whatever which is not based on the desktop of the individual user, but rather on the server. The distinction is probably real, but the article needs to be rewritten from scratch to be comprehensible. Readers can  have no assurance about what is standard terminology when the article is written with the clear purpose of presenting the POV of the author, which is to promote the server-based concept. The final paragraph is telling: " with all the jargon’s floating around there is a need for having clear understanding of ... accurate nomenclature. ... The effort is to ensure that the common layman understands the technology in the right perspective to be able to take the right decision."    DGG ( talk ) 02:30, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.