Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World-Wide Spectrum Efficiency


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) Desertarun (talk) 06:11, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

World-Wide Spectrum Efficiency

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Potentially un-notable, does not cite any sources (and has not since 2021), uses the wrong tone. Though tone is less of an issue, and non-notability and no sources are the big one  thetechie@wikimedia  :  ~/talk/  $  00:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting this discussion as there is no consensus and low participation. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep but burn to the ground and rewrite. This group does seem to have been discussed widely back around 2004-05:, ,  (note that the CNet article was long before Red Ventures turned the site into an AI-generated garbage heap).  The coverage may not quite be "significant" in all cases, but is there.  Regardless, the article is absolutely awful and is inexcusable in its current form.  Also, note that more recently the abbreviation WWiSE has been used for an unrelated software package: . WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Technology.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep - I have reworked it and added sources identified by WeirdNAnnoyed. ~Kvng (talk) 15:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The lead still isn't enough though. It just cuts straight to "Two industry "Pre-N" groups, TGnSync and the World-Wide Spectrum Efficiency (WWiSE), were formed". No identifying sentence.  thetechie@enwiki  :  ~/talk/  $  15:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * @TheTechie, Do you have a suggested improvement? Also, WP:NOTCLEANUP. ~Kvng (talk) 15:51, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Why not merge it to the timeline in IEEE 802.11n-2009 @TheTechie? That seemed like a reasonable suggestion to me. Alpha3031 (t • c) 07:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep But absolutely crummy stub. Needs a total rewrite. X (talk) 19:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.