Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Centre for Vedic Learning (Jabalpur)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 16:50, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

World Centre for Vedic Learning (Jabalpur)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable topic about an unbuilt tower. FiachraByrne (talk) 12:05, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:56, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 02:12, 8 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Been proposed, no real reliable source coverage. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  07:19, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep It seems silly to have an article about a building that hasn't been constructed yet (especially since the project has been in the pipeline for what must be decades by now), but I'm tentatively in favour of hanging on to this. It's been the subject of considerable coverage and speculation for years now, and even if it never gets built, the concept seems to have had enough mentions to be notable. Yunshui (talk) 07:23, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete this article is not notable enough and does not deserve its own page. Rabbabodrool (talk) 15:54, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Building is still only in the "vision" stage! -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 14:05, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.