Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Club Champion Football


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep the article, avoid crappy auto-translators. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 21:02, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

World Club Champion Football

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a directory entry on a game, lacking any independent sources or any evidence of importance. Guy (Help!) 09:17, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. The topic is notable, and it's an innovative game, but I can't find any reliable sources talking about it other than a handful of blog entries.  -- TedFrank 12:55, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep The two external links are enough for me (the official website and the fansite) Oskar 15:20, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Oskar. The links are enough to determine verifiability. Eugène van der Pijll 18:41, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Riiiiight. So an official site and a fansite constitutes evidence of encyclopaedic notability?  Better go and rewrite WP:N then. Guy (Help!)


 * Keep. A bit of background is probably apropos here - until a few days ago, this article had been a mass of auto-translated gibberish, apparently from the Japanese Wikipedia; this had been in place for well over a year. After it was posted to wikien-l, I decided to rewrite it as a sensible stub. Given that there is a rather extensive Japanese article on the subject, the article is probably worth keeping - it just needs some love from someone who actually knows something about the topic, unlike myself. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 20:19, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, the links in the article when it was nominated are already sufficient IMO. Taking a look at the actual text at WP:NOT, I can't see how it remotely applies here. Bryan Derksen 22:01, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep -- verifiable, encyclopedic. -- The Anome 22:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: An official website and a fan website fail WP:V. Corvus cornix 20:21, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep -- benefit of the doubt. This is an extensive article with extensive history by multiple Japanese wikipedians who are not part of this discussion. At a minimum I would like to have some sense what they were thinking before deleting. Wouldn't you? --Abu-Fool Danyal ibn Amir al-Makhiri 03:39, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.