Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Constitution (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:27, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

World Constitution

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Original research. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 13:00, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, likely speedy delete because it really doesn't have a subject to be about: This collection of material was put together and does not exist in this form in reality. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NFT, but I don't see this falling under A3 speedy. Might as well just let this run. Townlake (talk) 15:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete; prototypically WP:NFT and WP:BALLS; threatens to blossom into WP:COATRACK ("a combination of the world's best laws and ways of governing" inherently requires opining on what are the "best" and the criteria for making the determination); lastly, even if all the foregoing weren't so, and if we resolved to take it seriously, it would be WP:CRYSTAL. Doesn't appear to meet any CSD, though. - Simon Dodd { U·T·C·WP:LAW } 17:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Like Tears for Fears said, everybody wants to rule the world. This appears to be a cool idea from a high school student, who concedes that "This collection of material was put together and does not exist in this form in reality." and that "This constitution is only viable if all the world is united under one government".  However, it's only one man's opinion about what the ideal constitution would be.  Mandsford (talk) 21:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete; opinion, speculation, original research. FreplySpang 02:15, 8 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.