Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Defense Review (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:49, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

World Defense Review
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. 8 years ago was kept because... sigh ('it's important', 'it's on google', etc.). No improvements since. SPAM/not notable. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 22:39, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:45, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:45, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:45, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:45, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Doesn't appear to meet WP:WEB. Top google hits appear to be copycat sites under the same or similar names, and the mentions I see in published sources are all along the lines of one of the former contributors saying "I previously published this in World Defense Review". A couple of the contributors are themselves notable, but notability isn't inherited by the website itself.PohranicniStraze (talk) 14:50, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - The word "expert" appears three times in two lines with absolutely no substantiation. Eight years and not a single reference.-- Georgia Army Vet  Contribs  Talk  16:50, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable in-and-by itself for stand alone article. Kierzek (talk) 17:24, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability has just not been established here. Lacypaperclip (talk) 05:22, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Is there some relevant supertopic to which this could be merged? bd2412  T 21:16, 6 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.