Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Fashion Day


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 17:35, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

World Fashion Day

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

prod removed; no claim to notability and minimal google hits. . . Rcawsey (talk) 18:59, 4 April 2010 (UTC) — Kirovsky (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete. Nine Google hits, all Twitter, Facebook, blogs and Wikipedia. Even the first external link leads to a blog. Erpert (let's talk about it) 19:39, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete the idea has not seemed to have spread much beyond the conceiving organization. It has received little mention in any sources not directly tied to it. It may yet become notable (it looks like it was just announced two weeks ago), but right now it is not. Icewedge (talk) 19:56, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The article should be given time to be improved. As Icewedge mentioned it may yet become notable and its principles appear to have some merit. Bream1 (talk) 21:05, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Though set for March 21, 2010, it attracted no attention on that day nor in the two weeks beforehand. Worth a mention, perhaps, in the MOCA article. Mandsford (talk) 21:18, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Perhaps for now the article content can be inserted in the Moca Asia article. Bream1 (talk) 21:42, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Requesting courtesy of time to substantiate article in coming weeks. KWongtawan (talk) 22:30, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep The festival day is a great idea and obviously has universal appeal. Kirovsky (talk) 23:45, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * That the festival is a great idea doesn't make it worthy for inclusion. And KWongtawan, a subject should have an article after it becomes notable, not before. Erpert (let's talk about it) 00:36, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete This holiday does not seem to be old enough to have gained notability. RadManCF &#x2622; open frequency 00:08, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep to allow time to gather more information. It would be worth revisiting this article in 6 months to see its progress.Kirovsky (talk) 08:59, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Oops! Please don't "vote" more than once.  There's no limit to the number of comments that we can make in a discussion, but after a person has labelled their first comment "keep" or "delete", everything they say afterward is labelled "comment".  No harm done, and it's a mistake that all of us have made at one time, but it makes it easier for the administrator to see how many different people have registered an opinion.  Thank you. 72.151.55.27 (talk) 12:32, 6 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep as per Kirovsky and KWongtawan. Richter100 (talk) 14:30, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Worth a mention in the MoCA article, but beyond that topic, the day has no apparent significance.   Mbinebri   talk &larr; 01:59, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Having the potential to be notable in the future does not itself qualify as notability, nor does being "a great idea" or being subjectively deemed by some to have "universal appeal."Mmyers1976 (talk) 18:40, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.