Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Humanitarian Drive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. I'd be open to restoring this article to Draft space where you could continue to work on it or you could make a request at WP:REFUND and another admin can address your request. Liz Read! Talk! 06:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

World Humanitarian Drive

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Newly established NGO fails WP:GNG. LKBT (talk) 09:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and United Arab Emirates. LKBT (talk) 09:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: United Kingdom and England.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  11:50, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:08, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Dear LKBT, before considering the deletion request, I invite you to explore the article's edit history. The World Humanitarian Drive entry has been meticulously crafted in accordance with Wikipedia's rigorous policies and guidelines, incorporating verifiable information from multiple independent, third-party reliable sources such as WP:IS,WP:INDY,WP:INDEPENDENT. It diligently adheres to WP:GNG without any shortcomings. I am open to engaging in constructive discourse and refining the content rather than just flagging deletion for the sake of deletion. I respectfully request a comprehensive evaluation of the deletion request by any availbale experienced editor or administrator, recognising the conscientious edits contributed by individuals like User:Egeymi and the recent review conducted by User:Hey man im josh. Your thoughtful consideration of this matter is genuinely appreciated. Additionally, I would like to highlight that, in my belief, LKBT may not have thoroughly examined the authenticity of numerous articles worldwide guaranteing authenticity of World Humanitarian Drive.Rainylights (talk) 14:42, 10 November 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rainylights (talk • contribs) 14:35, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - non-notable. Low quality sources. Organization appears to mostly give out awards. For instance our Raghavan Seetharaman article states:
 * "Honoured with ‘Best CEO of the Century for Peace and Humanity’ award by World Humanitarian Drive WHD London"
 * See the Raghavan Seetharaman article's page history; it's been the subject of repeated sockpuppetry and COI editing.
 * -- A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 19:48, 15 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete, not seeing SIGCOV from reliable sources, just a ton of press releases and WP:NEWSORGINDIA paid placement. Freedom of the City of London is not particularly difficult to obtain (unless it's Honorary Freedom of the City of London, which is quite rare and newsworthy), so the gushing press releases about it being a hugely prestigious award for Abdul Basit Syed are of no use to us in determining notability of his organisation. Most of the remaining non-PR sources simply confirm that the group exists. Wikishovel (talk) 20:12, 15 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.