Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Information Technology and Services Alliance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  C T J F 8 3  chat 06:06, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

World Information Technology and Services Alliance

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No assertion of notability and without independent citations to back up its claims, it's little more than fancrust. Misterdiscreet (talk) 21:48, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:49, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  --  Beloved  Freak  16:17, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Here's a Google Books search result, and a Google Scholars search result. It also has a page on Eurofound, which is an organisation directly under the European Union.  Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 03:17, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep -This article hasn't got any attention but the topic is notable, and as such, the article needs to be improved with references, not deleted.Veritas Omnia Vincit (talk) 11:42, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep sufficient sources,as can be seen by looking. The main thing wrong was excessive external links, and I took care of them. "fancruft" as used here has a specific meaning,   the sort of thing a groupie would write,  and it does not apply to material that is just generally a little  promotional.    DGG ( talk ) 08:49, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.