Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Media Rights


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 17:05, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

World Media Rights

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable ROTM production company. Speedy request was declined on the basis that the company has produced two TV series, but even if those are notable (and I'd say that's far from clear), per WP:INHERITORG notability is not inherited.

The article is referenced only with the company's own website, and a search finds nothing even resembling sigcov (some RS hits, yes, but not discussing the actual company itself to any meaningful extent). Hence fails WP:GNG / WP:COMPANY. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete No significant coverage in RS, lots of blogs and stuff. Company website's news section doesn't even provide evidence of anything compelling going on. ROTM indeed. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:13, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - added several more works, mentioned Netflix and other customers, added independent news source. More to come. It's still just a stub, give it half a chance. Cheers, Facts707 (talk) 14:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * You created this article almost a month ago (and straight away it was tagged for lack of notability); wouldn't you agree that amounts to more than half a chance already? Stub or no stub, the subject must be notable, and to establish notability you need significant coverage in independent, secondary reliable sources. I didn't find any in my BEFORE search, but if you know of some, please feel free to add them. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:32, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  11:43, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Doesn't seem the sources are out there to demonstrate notability Dexxtrall (talk) 18:43, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I am unable to locate any deep or significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 16:56, 1 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.