Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Push Up Championships


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was closed as keep, nominator withdrew. Non admin close -- Staffwaterboy Critique Me Guestbook Hate Comments  01:40, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

World Push Up Championships

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable commercial event, with no history (first year), no substantial claim to the name "World" and no independent coverage. Scoop reference is a reprinted press release, as is nzlive.com. Infonews is a "publish your own news" website dramatic (talk) 23:53, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.


 * Delete - there are no reliable sources covering the event. Reprints of press releases don't count. -- Whpq (talk) 17:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Dominion Post has an article, satisfies WP:N. XLerate (talk) 01:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - I have updated the article with a link to the Dominion Post article mentioned. It also appeared on Prime News New Zealand. A copy of the coverage is available here...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrY3Yx4Bw0M. The 'World' title is only by default as it is the only event of its kind in the world (Maigheo11 00:14, 3 April 2009)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pastor Theo (talk) 00:16, 4 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep, sourced in multiple reliable sources = notable. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC).
 * Keep per meeting wp:n nobility there is enough reliable source for this article to be kept. Staffwaterboy Critique Me Guestbook Hate Comments 06:14, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per notability shown since first nominated.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:36, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination Withdrawn - looks like a keep now. dramatic (talk) 00:07, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.