Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Union


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:01, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

World Union

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No sources support the existence of this organization. Due to the generic nature of the name, ghits turn up ambiguous results. Notability isn't established through depth of coverage in third party reliable sources. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 13:46, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - any Auroville organisation would have left enough print trail.--Sodabottle (talk) 06:47, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Missing verifiability, no evidence of notability.--Chealer (talk) 18:04, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Found this reference: http://plasim.blogspot.com/2007/06/world-union-executive-body.html

Also I like to comment that the existence of an organisation is not directly related to the virtual world of internet.

ther is plenty of things that are neither in the internet nor on paper--79.14.66.102 (talk) 19:39, 13 July 2010 (UTC) — 79.14.66.102 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Delete No references found to substantiate notability. Could be redirected to Mirra Alfassa. Also, I am baffled why this minor organization has the "World Government" portal on its page. --MelanieN (talk) 14:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:19, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per nom. Article lacks any evidence of verifiable, third party coverage. VQuakr (talk) 00:32, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Lionel (talk) 17:55, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.